Comments on: Interactive Reactive Experiential Enviro

By: tebor

tebor — Sat, 13 Dec 2008 19:09:33 +0000

ha, still waking up is right… we’re a bit hung over across the street

The chill is giving us thoughts of the east, but nothing like their giant ice storm they just had.

Speaking of ice and snow, we may go to the gorge today to check some out. Thanks for reading Joan.

By: joan

joan — Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:39:27 +0000

dooooo, yes it is in sw. Still waking up….. How are you guys doing accross the street? Does the chill remind you of the east? jc

By: joan

joan — Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:28:10 +0000

very cool, is it in sw?

By: tebor

tebor — Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:14:28 +0000

I agree, and hence forth shall refer to it as Reactive Environments. I disagree that I (or any politician) should dumb down anything to communicate with Joe. Eff Joe and his limited linguistic skills.

By: steve

steve — Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:02:40 +0000

at it's root, it's all ubiquitous computing. but that's not very sexy is it? i really think saying you design/develop reactive environments is not only appropriate, but is equal parts cool and nerdy. calling it this would do two things: - eliminate the adjective environmental which is usually associated with a cause and replace it with a noun. - allow you to stop using words like array and nano-second when talking to joe sixPAck through mainstream media. steve’s last blog post..:: 2+2 always makes a 5 ::